Super Teacher's Job is Never Done!

Super Teacher's Job is Never Done!
Photo courtesy of DiscoveryEducation.com

Teaching is the profession that teaches all the other professions. ~ Author Unknown

My goal is to reveal one teacher's humble journey of self-reflection, critical analysis, and endless questioning about my craft of teaching and learning alongside my middle school students.

"The dream begins with a teacher who believes in you, who tugs and pushes and leads you to the next plateau, sometimes poking you with a sharp stick called 'truth'." ~ Dan Rather



Sunday, April 13, 2014

We all need some self-love!!

My close friend, Molly Rider, an awesome writer and life coach, just had an article published on self-love. I thought it was very appropriate to share, especially for us educators! Happy spring break!

From Molly :

I've been dancing around, crazy and excited becauseMindBodyGreen.com just published an article of mine that I submitted.Woo Hoo! 

It went live today and when they emailed me last night to let me know, I definitely ran around like Rocky with my arms in the air. LOL - sorry, no video.

Getting an article published on MindBodyGreen is such a dream come true. (and I totally thought they'd ignore my submission). They frequently publish articles written by people I look up to in so many ways, such as Deepak Chopra, Dr. Wayne Dyer and Gabriella Bernstein.  

I'd love love love for you to check it out and leave a comment, or share, or like…or respond in whatever way you feel moved. 

The article is titled: 5 Reasons Why Selfishness Is Actually The Key To Happiness (A little controversial, but mostly about the importance of Self-Love).

Here's the link:http://www.mindbodygreen.com/0-13301/why-selfishness-is-actually-the-key-to-happiness.html

Let me know what you think! 

Thanks so much!

Wednesday, April 9, 2014

What will the college experience look like moving forward?

Will student residential life disappear and completely be replaced by online learning?

This article offers fascinating -- and somewhat disturbing -- insight for all educators, parents, and students to consider.

Innovation Imperative: Change Everything

WHEN the first commercially successful steamship traveled the Hudson River in 1807, it didn’t appear to be much of a competitive threat to transoceanic sailing ships. It was more expensive, less reliable and couldn’t travel very far. Sailors dismissed the idea that steam technology could ever measure up — the vast reach of the Atlantic Ocean surely demanded sails. And so steam power gained its foothold as a “disruptive innovation” in inland waterways, where the ability to move against the wind, or when there was no wind at all, was important.
 
In 1819, the technology vastly improved, the S.S. Savannah made the first Atlantic crossing powered by steam and sail (in truth, only 80 of the 633-hour voyage was by steam). Sailing ship companies didn’t completely ignore the advancement. They built hybrid ships, adding steam engines to their sailing vessels, but never entered the pure steamship market. Ultimately, they paid the price for this decision. By the early 1900s, with steam able to power a ship across the ocean on its own, and do so faster than the wind, customers migrated to steamships. Every single transoceanic sailing-ship company went out of business.
 
Traditional colleges are currently on their hybrid voyage across the ocean.
 
Like steam, online education is a disruptive innovation — one that introduces more convenient and affordable products or services that over time transform sectors. Yet many bricks-and-mortar colleges are making the same mistake as the once-dominant tall ships: they offer online courses but are not changing the existing model. They are not saving students time and money, the essential steps to disruption. And though their approach makes sense in the short term, it leaves them vulnerable as students gravitate toward less expensive colleges.
 
For-profit universities latched on early to online learning, rough as it was in the 1990s. The target, as with all disruptive innovations, was customers who wouldn’t otherwise consume their product — in this case, working adults for whom traditional higher education was inconvenient. In theory, for-profit companies should have shaken up the higher education landscape. But federal financial aid seems to have gummed up the disruption: the easy revenue has encouraged some schools to indiscriminately enroll, often at the expense of quality, and has discouraged cost reduction.
 
Still, the theory predicts that, be it steam or online education, existing consumers will ultimately adopt the disruption, and a host of struggling colleges and universities — the bottom 25 percent of every tier, we predict — will disappear or merge in the next 10 to 15 years. Already traditional universities are showing the strains of a broken business model, reflecting demand and pricing pressures previously unheard-of in higher education. One example: Needing a cash infusion, Thunderbird School of Global Management in July announced a merger with Laureate Education Inc., an online pioneer.
 
Even the venerable Harvard Business School has ceded ground to online instruction. Before starting school, students are directed to learning modules on the web that cover entry-level accounting concepts. With the basic competencies covered, classes spend more time on higher-order discussion, and more deeply explore real-world applications. Harvard Business School is also developing a series of “pre-M.B.A. and post-M.B.A.” online courses that it plans to have ready by summer. It calls the initiative HBX.
 
Meanwhile, many universities have jumped on the MOOC bandwagon, creating a hodgepodge of these massive open online courses for public consumption. But for MOOCs to really fulfill their disruptive potential, they must be built into low-cost programs with certification of skills of value to employers. So far, only a few traditional universities have incorporated MOOCs into their curriculum, and only to supplement what they are already doing — like “flipping the classroom,” with lectures watched from home.
 
MITx is trying to add structure to the MOOC free-for-all by rolling out a sequence of computer science foundational courses this fall, and the MOOC provider Coursera has just started the Wharton M.B.A. Foundation Series. But perhaps the most promising experiment is from the Georgia Institute of Technology, which next year will start offering a $6,600 online master’s degree, a sixth the price of its current degree, in partnership with the MOOC platform Udacity and AT&T Georgia Tech is putting its reputation behind a MOOC credential.
 
The lessons from any number of industries teach us that those that truly innovate — fundamentally transforming the model, instead of just incorporating the technology into established methods of operation ­ — will have the final say. So it’s no wonder that observers of this phenomenon ask if online learning portends the end of the residential collegiate experience — the opportunity for students to live, socialize and learn together.
 
The experience that so many of us remember fondly — those bridge years from childhood to functioning adult — is already one that only a minority of students enjoys. According to the Census Bureau, just 30 percent of all beginning students live on a college campus. But it’s unlikely that the residential experience will disappear. Counterintuitive as it may seem, online instruction may mean even more students benefit from the collegial spirit, though one that looks quite different from the residential experience of today.
 
Right now, some students who want to live on campus find it prohibitively expensive; some who would rather commute live too far away to do so. As online learning evolves, students should be able to customize their experience with what they need and can afford. This kind of unbundling has occurred in countless industries.
 
Consider personal computers. Nascent technologies always underserve their customers. As they mature, the opposite happens: they overserve, with bells and whistles customers are less willing to pay for. In the beginning, computer components were unpredictable and not standardized, and each company had to build every one of its parts. As the ways in which the components fit together became better understood, companies like Dell could quickly and affordably customize a computer. A customer ordering a Dell in the 1990s specified the amount of memory wanted and type of Seagate drive and Intel processor. Dell simply snapped the modules together and shipped out a computer within 48 hours.
 
The Minerva Project, a start-up headquartered in San Francisco that aims to provide an affordable liberal arts education, offers clues as to how this might unfold in higher education. Minerva anticipates that most of its students will be from outside the United States. To serve them, it will enlist operators to create mini-campuses around the globe where clusters of its students will live and socialize together in residence halls, as well as take online courses and work together on projects.
With this unbundling, many more students should have the ability to create aspects of a residential experience for themselves. Some students might take courses online and then, to develop their skills, attend learning spaces like Dev Bootcamp in Chicago and San Francisco, or one of General Assembly’s eight locations around the world. Others may just value the flexibility and convenience of a total online learning experience.
 
As concepts and skills are taught more effectively online, it’s unlikely that face-to-face interaction will cease to matter. Instead, students will be able to arrange for such experiences when it suits the job they need to get done. Given the reality that we all have different learning needs at different times, that’s a far more student-centered experience. It may not benefit some colleges but should create more options for all students.
 
Clayton M. Christensen is a professor of business administration at Harvard. Michael B. Horn is executive director for education at the Clayton Christensen Institute for Disruptive Innovation. They are co-authors of “Disrupting Class: How Disruptive Innovation Will Change the Way the World Learns.”

Tuesday, April 8, 2014

A wonderful school to emulate!

A fellow Harvard peer just posted this, and I had to share. What an incredible school it depicts, one that is clearly working to meet the needs of ALL students every day. WOW!

Hi Everyone,

I am from T440 class of 2003. Always in solidarity with you, but have never posted. You all inspire me to continue to create places for children (and teachers!) that bring hope and possibility. I am an assistant principal  of a large elementary school in Seal Beach, California. We serve 850 kids, 100 or so have special needs. We also have a long tradition of the arts in our school. We created this video in preparation for a California Distinguished School validation visit. The video touches my heart and so, I wanted to share with you.  Enjoy! http://goo.gl/nADN2p

Tanya

Monday, April 7, 2014

Skype with LitPick - An Online Education Reading and Writing Program

This is VERY cool! Check it out!

LitPick, formerly Flamingnet Book Reviews, has been named a Best Website for Teaching & Learning by the American Association of School Librarians (AASL), a division of the American Library Association.

Please
contact us to arrange a virtual Skype tour of LitPick and of our unique FREE online reading and writing program.

Also, check out our new YouTube video.
LitPick - The Movie


Seth Cassel
Founder and President

LitPick Student Book Reviews

www.litpick.com

Friday, April 4, 2014

Text Complexity Resources from NCTE

I love the National Council for Teachers of English!

Here are some resources to support your students in comprehending today's complex literary texts.
Check out these events on professional collaboration.
  • View the #nctechat Archive on "The Importance of Collaboration."
  • Join us this summer for the CEL Institute on "Critical Issues: Assessment" for focused, collaborative work with literacy leaders from across the country.

Nominate a colleague for the NCTE Outstanding Middle Level Educator Award (formerly the Edwin A. Hoey Award). The language arts magazine Scholastic Scope sponsors this award and provides a cash award of $2,500. Nominations must be submitted by the May 1, 2014 deadline.

Debbie Zagorski
Middle Level Administrative Liaison
National Council of Teachers of English
1111 W. Kenyon Road
Urbana, IL 61801-1096
800-369-6283 ext. 3612
www.ncte.org/middle

Block Scheduling: The Debate Continues

I have taught in middle schools with and without block scheduling and honestly see the argument on both sides. Check out this fascinating link to form your own opinion:

CCASN (http://casn.berkeley.edu) has just revised its comprehensive writing on block and other scheduling options for high schools. It is probably the definitive work on scheduling.

That having been said, the first question has got to be, "Scheduling for what purpose?"

If you have not addressed purpose, then any old schedule will [not] do. And if you change the schedule radically, you had better give teachers a lot of time to work together to figure out how to design instruction to fit the new system.

But again, I'd rather start with: what do we want kids to learn, and how will we know that they know it? What kinds of things should they be doing to learn that? Then, how should we structure time so they can do that?

TGIF!!