Super Teacher's Job is Never Done!

Super Teacher's Job is Never Done!
Photo courtesy of DiscoveryEducation.com

Teaching is the profession that teaches all the other professions. ~ Author Unknown

My goal is to reveal one teacher's humble journey of self-reflection, critical analysis, and endless questioning about my craft of teaching and learning alongside my middle school students.

"The dream begins with a teacher who believes in you, who tugs and pushes and leads you to the next plateau, sometimes poking you with a sharp stick called 'truth'." ~ Dan Rather



Friday, March 25, 2011

What Testing Does to our Students' Self Worth

A former Harvard classmate recently posted an interesting article she wrote to our Listserv that I want to share with you all. Here is her explanation of what prompted her piece:


"As a student, I thought a lot about national testing and the effect it has on a student's sense of self / possibility. Living in Tanzania and Zanzibar has heightened my questions. Because I've connected with so many [of you] with similar questions, I hope that it's okay that I'm posting a link to a commentary/opinion piece I wrote about the topic here:http://blog.contrarymagazine.com/2011/03/examining-the-exam-failure-or-fraud/. I welcome your comments either in public or private message."



This article is beautifully written, and I highly recommend it to all of you.


Here is one quote from the article I especially love: "But I do know that a test can't possibly reflect the inner questions and dreams of a nation, measure the hidden beauties and talents of young people who manifest mad categorical skills that defy curricular goals. It's not a secret that a nation's irrational emphasis on a single or several tests to determine a young person's fate is simply code for class war."


I hope you enjoy this article as much as I did!





Examining the exam: Form IV failure or fraud?

by AMANDA LEIGH LICHTENSTEIN on MARCH 16, 2011

Is there really beauty in failure? We sometimes romanticize failure as a kind of revelation. Honey in the garbage heap, lesson in the crease.
But lately I’ve been thinking about schooling. We advocate a certain kind of failure, risk, and experimentation as essential pedagogical values in the progressive classroom, and that’s beautiful.
But I’m talking about systems, a nation’s educative task. Is there any beauty in a nation’s failure to fairly educate its young people?
While living in Zanzibar, an island whose education policies fall under a broader Tanzanian system, I can’t help but follow what’s happening in the U.S. right now, and draw startling parallels, at least when it comes to failing schools.
President Obama and Arne Duncan announced recently that 82% of America’s schools are failing, calling for massive reforms to the No Child Left Behind Act. Meanwhile, in Tanzania, it’s really no secret that an unwieldy number of students fail their Form IV exams every year, casting them off into a stormy sea of decisions that for many, simply swallow them whole with self-doubt and anxiety about the future.
In February, Tanzania’s Guardian Reporter described last year’s 2010 Form IV exam results as a “national disaster,” blaming the typical suspects for far-reaching failure in both urban and rural districts, on the mainland and in Zanzibar (the islands of Unguja and Pemba).  The failure rate had risen over 50% since last year.
The unofficial word on Zanzibar streets is that Tanzanian mainland corruption is to blame for even higher failure rates on the island. Many people I’ve talked to claim that Tanzania’s National Examination Board is biased and therefore publishes false results for Zanzibar.
It seems like with immense resources (America) or with fewer (Tanzania/Zanzibar), the very notion of national schooling is failing young people everywhere who, for the most part, just want to live a life defined by dignity and possibility.
Zoom in for a second on Salha, my neighbor and friend, who eagerly asked me last month if she could come over to my house to access 2010 Form IV test results online. She and her classmates were in a frenzied state over their test scores because they know that their futures depend on it. Once you fail Form IV, it’s unlikely that you’ll continue your education, unless you can find the means to take the exam again, or muster up an alternative dream.
The internet connection was so jammed that night with eager seekers that we could barely access the site. Salha didn’t feel comfortable using my laptop, so she hovered over my shoulder and insisted I keep checking. This went on until midnight. We kept getting the same message until morning, when finally her school’s results were revealed.
I printed out the results at my office and carried them back to the neighborhood that evening, presenting them to Salha and a cluster of other anxious family members and classmates who huddled over the results as Salha slid her pointer-finger down a long row of names until she reached her own. She slid her finger to the far right, only to read that she had, indeed, failed. She would not be going onto Form Five. She’d been banished from her nation’s school system. Her reaction: nonplussed.
Like so many students around the world (in all worlds, first, second, third — those numbers, meaningless, really), Salha’s a bright girl whose national testing system had failed her. The Form IV exam is a nightmare of triumvirate languages: English, Arabic, and Swahili. It asks young people to move gracefully through a series of questions written in primarily in a language (English) in which they have not yet truly formed identities. Though English is currently the national mode of instruction, Swahili is the duelling second language in which most Zanzibari youth first get to know themselves, their country, their cultures.
Most Tanzanian schools attempt strict English-only policies, but more often than not, teachers are not confident English speakers and therefore end up teaching in Swahili, with English being only cursorily addressed as a subject, and not necessarily as an embodied language. Imagine (if English is your first language, and you’re American) taking the ACT’s or SAT’s in a totally different language after having say, a semester of said language, and then having your college fate hinged on the results of this test.
Two summers ago I worked as a teaching artist with the International Theatre Literacy Project in rural northern Tanzania, just outside of the city of Arusha, otherwise known as A-town (www.itlp.org). Founded by theater advocate and educator Marianna Houston, from New York, ITLP’s mission is to strengthen English language and literacy skills through the literary and performing arts. For eight weeks, my colleague and I, Lee Sunday Evans, a New York theater artist, worked with Form IV students to facilitate the writing and production of an original theater piece to be performed for the community.
Just months away from their make-it-or-break it national exam, our students struggled with English language skills, especially when it came to critical thinking, inquiry, creativity, and self-expression. Theirs was a text-book style English that felt rehearsed, antiquated, and detached from their vibrant and varied personalities, which were revealed slowly throughout the rehearsal process.
Our students ended up producing a brilliant, mythical performance about a young girl who seeks answers a journey through a “forest of questions,” but it was with absolutely no help from their English classroom teacher, Ms. Hilda, who often felt more like a shy student than a teacher with the self-confidence to motivate her eager but taxed students, whose lives were full of contending responsibilities.
Many lament the deep fall out of this languishing language debate. Maybe improved English instruction in Tanzanian/Zanzibar schools is the revelatory solution, but it’s not the only one, and certainly not the least loaded. To scratch at this scab is to irritate a policy debate that clangs and clashes with a contested regional history of colonialism and power – a narrative dotted with language wars and border disputes. It’s a debate that effects the real time lives of everyday students wanting to make their parents (and their presidents) proud. It’s an IMF debate. It’s a development debate. It’s a religious debate. It’s a debate circumscribed by good intentions and theories of change.
Unasamaje unfair kwa Kiswahili?
And meanwhile, another year goes by feeling like the entire nation is failing, has failed their young, and will continue to fail if we don’t call out the potential fraud behind these apparent failings. I could be talking here, it seems, about Zanzibar or America at this point. See what I mean?
I’m not the first to announce that the test-obsession itself is flawed. My education friends can rant and riff off this idea way more eloquently than I. But I do know that a test can’t possibly reflect the inner questions and dreams of a nation, measure the hidden beauties and talents of young people who manifest mad categorical skills that defy curricular goals. It’s not a secret that a nation’s irrational emphasis on a single or several tests to determine a young person’s fate is simply code for class war.
Where are the sirens? The national crisis (America, Tanzania, wherever) is not that a majority of students are failing, but clearly that public adults, and the systems we’ve built, the values we’ve espoused, are failing our students. And there’s nothing beautiful about that.
A few weeks ago in Stone Town, I had to make a trip to the central post office. When I arrived, a sea of young students were flooding its gates, making it nearly impossible to enter. Young ladies wearing a rainbow of brightly coloured headscarves — hot pink to lime green — with black bui-bui’s over Western style jeans and shirts, stood waiting in clusters of increasing misery, the hot Zanzibar sun beating down on their disgruntled faces. Boys, too, though fewer, were dressed in nice professional gear, carrying notebooks and backpacks. Some had slunk down onto the steps, resting their heads on the nooks of their arms, leaning on each other.
They were all waiting for the chance to purchase a new Form IV exam. All of these students — I’d say over three hundred — had failed their national exams.
Most students waiting there that day, sitting on the ground, leaning against the walls, standing in tight-knit circles, were willing to pay out of their own pocket to take the test again, to get another shot at passing so that they could go on with their studies. But hundreds of other students couldn’t afford the test and must scramble to figure out a future far-flung from the national promise.
Salha considered signing up for a sewing course, but lacks fund necessary for tuition and registration. For now, she helps out her family by selling cigarettes one by one out of a wooden box at the local park. It’s one hundred shillings per cigarette. That’s like, .06 cents per smoke.
Seeing these students waiting in there in the hot sun with their one goal being to register again for a test they failed (but that continues to fail them) was a heart-breaking scene. To make matters worse, they’d run out of enough forms for all the students who wanted to register, and that’s why they were waiting. They were camped out, determined.
As Obama continues to urge congress to “fix” NCLB, the movement is not so organized here in Zanzibar, where bewildered students, parents, and teachers lament the situation, but don’t have a systematic, national movement  to confront it. While there is good work happening here, as in the States, to counter the destructive or just downright irrelevant policies that shape education in either place, little is done to yank nails out of the shaky structure we call national education, to rebuild, start over, get honest.
In America or Zanzibar, we’d have to twist our logic, wring out the test-obsession, turn it inside out, reveal its flaws and inadequacies, acknowledge the great sea change of collective action necessary to unearth the talent of a nation, any nation, any where.
Salha, like so many other young people across two oceans in America (and around the world) are not failures, but live within failed systems that set them up for failure. If there’s any beauty in failure, it’s the beauty that comes from holding up a collective mirror to our contrarian notions of winning, and determine then, to examine the exam.

Thursday, March 24, 2011

Do you have Adult ADHD?

We all know that ADD and ADHD diagnoses are now as common among children and adolescents as names like Rachel, Jennifer, Matt, and Sam. I often wonder, though, whether I too might exhibit these traits.


I always joke about the fact that I have adult-onset ADD, but this quiz passed on by a close colleague pretty much just confirmed it. Not surprisingly, many of my colleagues also scored similarly. What does that say about us middle school educators?! Hehe.


Where do you fall?


PS: I scored a 17, although I’m pretty sure I’m in the 15-16 range.
Most of mine comes from not being able to sit still and the line waiting. Luckily, organization is still one of my strong suits! 

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Why are our paraeducators so de-valued?

Well, it's that stressful time of year in schools, the time where we are hit by all sides with standardized testing, budget cuts, and staffing allocations. Every year, the budget crisis gets worse and worse in our county. Every year, teaching and support staff positions are cut. It's like our Board of Education members are attempting to get rid of everything "unnecessary" in our schools.


Unfortunately, paraprofessionals often fall in this underappreciated, extremely underpaid, and heavily cut category, and for no good reason. The work they do with students on a daily basis is challenging, stressful, meaningful, and impactful. Yet many school districts treat them like "bottom of the barrel" support personnel that we can easily live without. 


A recent neatoday article speaks to this depressing trend that I think will speak to you all:




First Person

A Tale of Two Paychecks

Why is my paraprofessional classroom work valued so low?

By Jean Fay

Photos by John Polak

I have a wonderful job. As a public school paraprofessional, I help teach kindergartners to read.

One arrived in September with a very limited grasp of English. Attempts to coax him into writing even the first letter of his name usually ended in frustration and tears. But I made sure he knew I wasn’t going to give up on him. Slowly, he began writing one letter, then three, then all the letters in his name.

Recently, I read the class one of my favorite books, “Shoe Shoe Baby” by Katherine Lodge, a cute story about a girl who loves shoes—a girl after my own heart. My student noticed the miniature high-heeled shoe I wear on a chain around my neck and said to me, Just like Shoe Shoe Baby! He had connected text to an image—the light bulb going off over his head was so bright, I almost needed sunglasses.

A wonderful job.

But the pay is low. So I also work part-time in the jewelry department at JCPenney.

When I compare my two paychecks, I am saddened to realize that even though one check is for part-time and the other is for a full-time position, the dollar amounts aren’t that different.

It is puzzling to me that our society doesn’t value and reward the important work that many of us education support professionals (ESPs) do.

ESPs teach children to read, to make connections, to ask questions. We comfort children when they are sad or hurt. We encourage them in everything they do, and celebrate all their accomplishments. We do all these things with dedication and love.



Recently, I had two wonderful encounters with former students. The first was with a now very grown-up first grader who often visits me at my jewelry counter. This time she came with a gift, a small toy—”for your classroom”—bought with her own money. She cared enough about her former classroom to want to give something back.

The second was with a student from my very first group of kindergartners. She is now a senior in high school, and wanted help with a project for her photography class. She knew I was politically active, and asked for advice on getting good election night photos. I invited her to attend an election night function with me, and later introduced her to our state legislators and U.S. representative. She took wonderful photos, and her mother informed me later that she received an A.

As I look at my two paychecks and think about my two very different jobs, I wonder what is valued more—selling jewelry or teaching children?

We need to think about how we compensate our ESPs for the enormous contributions they make. I will keep telling whoever will listen, whether it’s a legislator, school board member, or taxpayer, that we can do better, and I encourage others to do the same.

Jean Fay works at Crocker Farm School in Amherst, Massachusetts, and is a 2010 graduate of the NEA ESP Leaders for Tomorrow program.

© Copyright 2002-2010 National Education Association

Full article available at: http://www.nea.org/home/42307.htm. 

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Too Much Praise for Our Students? You Decide!!

Teacher A says we praise today's kids too much. Teacher B insists that kids only grow and develop proper self-esteem through regular encouragement and praise. Teacher C says we ought to be more selective with our praise of students and reserve it only for truly exceptional work. And Teacher D simply says kids are over-praised and too spoiled and enabled today.

While every teacher is entitled to his or her opinion and belief systems, I firmly believe it is our job to provide timely, kind, effective, and meaningful feedback to students on their work, both verbally and on paper. There is a difference between praise, criticism, and feedback too. Feedback aims to be instructional and provide students with concrete evidence of what they have mastered -- and how they can achieve future and more complex goals, objectives, and indicators in a content area.

Both feedback and simple praise have appropriate places in the modern classroom. The question every educator must grapple with is how much, how often, and to what extent this kind of feedback is given. Read on to discover more about this elusive "Praise Paradox."




The Praise Paradox

Are we smothering kids in kind words?


By Po Bronson and Ashley Merryman

Illustration by Michael Glenwood

Thomas (his middle name) is a fifth-grader at the highly competitive P.S. 334, the Anderson School on West 84th in New York City. Since Thomas could walk, he has constantly heard that he is smart. Not just from his parents but from any adult who has come in contact with this precocious child. When he applied to Anderson for kindergarten, his intelligence was statistically confirmed. The school is reserved for the top 1 percent of all applicants, and an IQ test is required. Thomas didn’t just score in the top 1 percent. He scored in the top 1 percent of the top 1 percent.

But as Thomas has progressed through school, this self-awareness that he’s smart hasn’t always translated into fearless confidence when attacking his schoolwork. In fact, Thomas’s father noticed just the opposite. “Thomas didn’t want to try things he wouldn’t be successful at,” his father says. “Some things came very quickly to him, but when they didn’t, he gave up almost immediately, concluding, ‘I’m not good at this.’” With no more than a glance, Thomas was dividing the world into two—things he was naturally good at and things he wasn’t.

For instance, in the early grades, Thomas wasn’t very good at spelling, so he simply demurred from spelling out loud. When Thomas took his first look at fractions, he balked. The biggest hurdle came in third grade. He was supposed to learn cursive penmanship, but he wouldn’t even try for weeks. By then, his teacher was demanding homework be completed in cursive. Rather than play catch-up on his penmanship, Thomas refused outright. Thomas’s father tried to reason with him. “Look, just because you’re smart doesn’t mean you don’t have to put out some effort.” (Eventually, Thomas mastered cursive, but not without a lot of cajoling from his father.)

Why does this child, who is measurably at the very top of the charts, lack confidence about his ability to tackle routine school challenges?
Thomas is not alone. For a few decades, it’s been noted that a large percentage of all gifted students (those who score in the top 10 percent on aptitude tests) severely underestimate their own abilities. Those afflicted with this lack of perceived competence adopt lower standards for success and expect less of themselves. They underrate the importance of effort, and they overrate how much help they need from a parent.

When parents praise their children’s intelligence, they believe they are providing the solution to this problem. According to a survey conducted by Columbia University, 85 percent of American parents think it’s important to tell their kids that they’re smart. In and around the New York area, according to my own (admittedly nonscientific) poll, the number is more like 100 percent. Everyone does it, habitually. “You’re so smart, Kiddo,” just seems to roll off the tongue.

“Early and often,” bragged one mom, of how often she praised.

Another dad throws praise around “every chance I get.” I heard that kids are going to school with affirming handwritten notes in their lunchboxes and—when they come home—there are star charts on the refrigerator. Boys are earning baseball cards for clearing their plates after dinner, and girls are winning manicures for doing their homework. These kids are saturated with messages that they’re doing great—that they are great, innately so. They have what it takes.

The presumption is that if a child believes he’s smart (having been told so, repeatedly), he won’t be intimidated by new academic challenges. The constant praise is meant to be an angel on the shoulder, ensuring that children do not sell their talents short.

But a growing body of research—and a new study from the trenches of the New York City public school system—strongly suggest it might be the other way around. Giving kids the label of “smart” does not prevent them from underperforming. It might actually be causing it.

For the past ten years, Dr. Carol Dweck and her team at Columbia University have studied the effect of praise on students in 20 New York schools. Her seminal work—a series of experiments on 400 fifth-graders—paints the picture most clearly. Prior to these experiments, praise for intelligence had been shown to boost children’s confidence. But Dweck suspected that this would backfire the first moment kids experienced failure or difficulty.

Dweck sent four female research assistants into New York fifth-grade classrooms. The researchers would take a single child out of the classroom for a nonverbal IQ test consisting of a series of puzzles—puzzles easy enough that all the children would do fairly well. Once the child finished the test, the researchers told each student his score, then gave him a single line of praise. Randomly divided into groups, some were praised for their intelligence. They were told, “You must be smart at this.” Other students were praised for their effort: “You must have worked really hard.”

Why just a single line of praise? “We wanted to see how sensitive children were,” Dweck explained. “We had a hunch that one line might be enough to see an effect.”

Then the students were given a choice of test for the second round. One choice was a test that would be more difficult than the first, but the researchers told the kids that they’d learn a lot from attempting the puzzles. The other choice, Dweck’s team explained, was an easy test, just like the first. Of those praised for their effort, 90 percent chose the harder set of puzzles. Of those praised for their intelligence, a majority chose the easy test. The “smart” kids took the cop-out.

Why did this happen? “When we praise children for their intelligence,” Dweck wrote in her study summary, “we tell them that this is the name of the game: look smart, don’t risk making mistakes.” And that’s what the fifth-graders had done. They’d chosen to look smart and avoid the risk of being embarrassed.

In a subsequent round, none of the fifth-graders had a choice. The test was difficult, designed for kids two years ahead of their grade level. Predictably, everyone failed. But again, the two groups of children, divided at random at the study’s start, responded differently. Those praised for their effort on the first test assumed they simply hadn’t focused hard enough on this test. “They got very involved, willing to try every solution to the puzzles,” Dweck recalled. “Many of them remarked, unprovoked, ‘This is my favorite test.’” Not so for those praised for their smarts. They assumed their failure was evidence that they weren’t really smart at all. “Just watching them, you could see the strain. They were sweating and miserable.”

Having artificially induced a round of failure, Dweck’s researchers then gave all the fifth-graders a final round of tests that were engineered to be as easy as the first round. Those who had been praised for their effort significantly improved on their first score—by about 30 percent. Those who’d been told they were smart did worse than they had at the very beginning—by about 20 percent.

Dweck had suspected that praise could backfire, but even she was surprised by the magnitude of the effect. “Emphasizing effort gives a child a variable that they can control,” she explains. “They come to see themselves as in control of their success. Emphasizing natural intelligence takes it out of the child’s control, and it provides no good recipe for responding to a failure.”

In follow-up interviews, Dweck discovered that those who think that innate intelligence is the key to success begin to discount the importance of effort. I am smart, the kids’ reasoning goes; I don’t need to put out effort. Expending effort becomes stigmatized—it’s public proof that you can’t cut it on your natural gifts.

Repeating her experiments, Dweck found this effect of praise on performance held true for students of every socioeconomic class. It hit both boys and girls—the very brightest girls especially (they collapsed the most following failure). Even preschoolers weren’t immune to the inverse power of praise.

Even those who’ve accepted the new research on praise have trouble putting it into practice. Sue Needleman is both a mother of two and an elementary school teacher with 11 years’ experience. Last year, she was a fourth-grade teacher at Ridge Ranch Elementary in Paramus, New Jersey. She has never heard of Carol Dweck, but the gist of Dweck’s research has trickled down to her school, and Needleman has learned to say, “I like how you keep trying.” She tries to keep her praise specific, rather than general, so that a child knows exactly what she did to earn the praise (and thus can get more). She will occasionally tell a child, “You’re good at math,” but she’ll never tell a child he’s bad at math.

But that’s at school, as a teacher. At home, old habits die hard. Her eight-year-old daughter and her five-year-old son are indeed smart, and sometimes she hears herself saying, “You’re great. You did it. You’re smart.” When I press her on this, Needleman says that what comes out of academia often feels artificial. “When I read the mock dialogues, my first thought is, Oh, please. How corny.”

No such qualms exist for teachers at the Life Sciences Secondary School in East Harlem, because they’ve seen Dweck’s theories applied to their junior high students. Dweck and her protégée, Dr. Lisa Blackwell, published a report in the academic journal Child Development about the effect of a semester-long intervention conducted to improve students’ math scores.

Life Sciences is a health-science magnet school with high aspirations but 700 students whose main attributes are being predominantly minority and low achieving. Blackwell split her kids into two groups for an eight-session workshop. The control group was taught study skills, and the others got study skills and a special module on how intelligence is not innate. These students took turns reading aloud an essay on how the brain grows new neurons when challenged. They saw slides of the brain and acted out skits. “Even as I was teaching these ideas,” Blackwell noted, “I would hear the students joking, calling one another ‘dummy’ or ‘stupid.’” After the module was concluded, Blackwell tracked her students’ grades to see if it had any effect.

It didn’t take long. The teachers—who hadn’t known which students had been assigned to which workshop—could pick out the students who had been taught that intelligence can be developed. They improved their study habits and grades. In a single semester, Blackwell reversed the students’ longtime trend of decreasing math grades.
The only difference between the control group and the test group were two lessons, a total of 50 minutes spent teaching not math but a single idea: that the brain is a muscle. Giving it a harder workout makes you smarter. That alone improved their math scores.

“These are very persuasive findings,” says Columbia’s Dr. Geraldine Downey, a specialist in children’s sensitivity to rejection. “They show how you can take a specific theory and develop a curriculum that works.”

Psychologist Wulf-Uwe Meyer, a pioneer in the field, conducted a series of studies during which children watched other students receive praise. According to Meyer’s findings, by the age of 12, children believe that earning praise from a teacher is not a sign you did well—it’s actually a sign you lack ability and the teacher thinks you need extra encouragement. They’ve picked up the pattern: kids who are falling behind get drowned in praise. Teens, Meyer found, discounted praise to such an extent that they believed it’s a teacher’s criticism that really conveys a positive belief in a student’s aptitude.

Excessive praise also distorts children’s motivation; they begin doing things merely to hear the praise, losing sight of intrinsic enjoyment. Scholars from Reed College and Stanford reviewed over 150 praise studies. Their analysis determined that praised students become risk-averse and lack perceived autonomy. The scholars found consistent correlations between a liberal use of praise and students’ “shorter task persistence, more eye-checking with the teacher, and inflected speech such that answers have the intonation of questions.” When they get to college, heavily praised students commonly drop out of classes rather than suffer a mediocre grade, and they have a hard time picking a major—they’re afraid to commit to something because they’re afraid of not succeeding.

One suburban New Jersey high school English teacher told me she can spot the kids who get overpraised at home. Their parents think they’re just being supportive, but the students sense their parents’ high expectations, and feel so much pressure they can’t concentrate on the subject, only the grade they will receive. “I had a mother say, ‘You are destroying my child’s self-esteem,’ because I’d given her son a C. I told her, ‘Your child is capable of better work.’ I’m not there to make them feel better. I’m there to make them do better.”

When students transition into junior high, some who’d done well in elementary school inevitably struggle in the larger and more demanding environment. Those who equated their earlier success with their innate ability surmise they’ve been dumb all along. Their grades never recover because the likely key to their recovery—increasing effort—they view as just further proof of their failure. In interviews many confess they would “seriously consider cheating.”

Students turn to cheating because they haven’t developed a strategy for handling failure. The problem is compounded when a parent ignores a child’s failures and insists that he’ll do it better next time. Michigan scholar Jennifer Crocker studies this exact scenario and explains that the child may come to believe failure is something so terrible, the family can’t acknowledge its existence. A child deprived of the opportunity to discuss mistakes can’t learn from them.

Offering praise has become a sort of panacea for the anxieties of modern parenting. Out of our children’s lives from breakfast to dinner, we turn it up a notch when we get home. In those few hours together, we want them to hear things we can’t say during the day—We are in your corner, we are here for you, we believe in you.

In a similar way, we put our children in high-pressure environments, seeking out the best schools we can find, then we use the constant praise to soften the intensity of those environments. We expect so much of them, but we hide our expectations behind constant glowing praise. For me, the duplicity became glaring.

I realized that not telling my son he was smart meant I was leaving it up to him to make his own conclusion about his intelligence. Jumping in with praise is like jumping in too soon with the answer to a homework problem—it robs him of the chance to make the deduction himself.
But what if he makes the wrong conclusion?

Can I really leave this up to him, at his age?

I’m still an anxious parent. This morning, I tested him on the way to school: “What happens to your brain, again, when it gets to think about something hard?”

“It gets bigger, like a muscle,” he responded, having aced this one before.


Po Bronson and Ashley Merryman’s Time and New York Magazinearticles on the science of parenting have won several prestigious awards.

Nurture Shock has been cited in more than two dozen scholarly journals and is being taught in universities around the country.Learn more about the book.

Adapted from Chapter 1, “The Inverse Power of Praise” from the book Nurture Shock: New Thinking About Children, Copyright 2011 by Po Bronson and Ashley Merryman. Reprinted with permission by Twelve/Hachette Book Group. All rights reserved.




Greater Expectations



Photo by Thomas M. Perkins

Too little praise leaves kids—and entire communities—doubting their potential.


There are still plenty of poverty-stricken communities in America where you won’t see a Prius, you won’t smell that Starbucks fresh brew, and you won’t hear praise, bland or otherwise, for children.
These are places where tens of thousands of children believe they won’t do any better than they’ve ever done before. Their “collective efficacy beliefs,” as noted by researchers, are as low as their average standardized test scores. It’s a dismal cycle, especially in many African-American communities and on many American Indian reservations: poor results feed low expectations, which lead to poor results and low expectations.

But, as Bronson and Merryman point out in Nurture Shock, the cycle can be broken—especially if kids begin to see ability as changeable.
“Work hard, get smart,” is the mantra of the Efficacy Institute, a not-for-profit agency based near Boston that has done reform work in traditionally low-performing schools with high numbers of minority students.

At Peres Elementary in Richmond, California, 100 percent of students receive free or reduced-price lunch and 100 percent are minorities, mostly Hispanic or African-American. But they believe in themselves—that hard, focused work “through all your days in school (will lead to) getting a master’s degree and a good job,” says one student in a school video.

“We say, ‘Work hard!’ and they say, ‘Get smart!’” said Heidi Scharffenberg, a Peres kindergarten teacher, in the Efficacy video. “One of my little ones, his writing was all over the place at the beginning of the year. You see him writing now and say, ‘How’s it going?’ and he says, ‘I’m working hard! I’m working hard! I’m working hard!’”

Since Peres began its work with Efficacy, its test scores have jumped more than 300 points on the state Academic Performance Index, placing them in the top ranking of similar schools. But it’s not just because kids have adopted the mantra. It’s also because teachers are sharing test data in focused grade-level meetings— and with students.

Data feedback is called “food for getting smart,” and kids say they commonly take home old tests to rework the wrong answers. “It’s empowering—it’s not a bad score, it’s a score that students can study and see where they went wrong,” said third-grade teacher Falin Minoru.

That kind of feedback points to an important difference between praise and encouragement—and the difference is studied in NEA’s Culture, Abilities, Resilience, and Effort (C.A.R.E.) training, a program that asks educators to reflect on the causes of the achievement gaps and find their students’ unrecognized strengths.

One is nonspecific—“you did a great job”—and ultimately not very useful for the student, said Denise Alston, C.A.R.E. presenter and NEA’s Priority Schools Campaign staff person. “You don’t want kids wondering, ‘What exactly did I do right this time?’  You want to give them specific feedback that tells them how they can get those good results again.”

Eventually, if the message is consistent, it’s not just students who come to believe that hard work will make them all smart and proficient. It’s their teachers too. Said one Peres teacher, “It’s in them. They’re brilliant. We just need to bring it out.”

For more information about bringing NEA’s Culture, Abilities, Resilience, and Effort (C.A.R.E) training to your school or district, contact your state affiliate. Also, check out the C.A.R.E. guide.
© Copyright 2002-2010 National Education Association

Full article available at: http://www.nea.org/home/42298.htm.

Monday, March 21, 2011

The Help Question: How much is too much?

Every teacher's pet peeve is the undermotivated, lazy student full of such potential who refuses to put forth any real effort. That student is perfectly fine getting by with Cs when we know deep down he or she is capable of As and much more. 


Then there are the students who give up far too easily when the going gets tough. These students often need to work their butts off for good grades and often get frustrated when concepts do not come easily to them. 


Can we truly change these students' ingrained attitudes and mentalities, though? Can we help motivate the underachievers while providing the necessary motivation and guidance to inspire natural "quitters" to help themselves? I'd like to think so. Read on:


Quitters

Can you help kids who refuse to help themselves?

Jenny asks:

I’m a substitute on extended assignment as a special education teacher at a small country high school. I have students I assist in an Algebra I inclusion class. Some of them refuse to participate. They won’t even try. I overheard one saying his mom was going to let him drop out next year! Is there a way to reverse their attitudes?

Kate Ortiz: Only they can reverse their attitudes, but there are things you can do.

People are motivated by success, so it may help if you provide bits of success that lead to note-taking and homework completion, rather than focusing on the bigger goal.

Can you get the notes ahead of time and give students a copy with blanks in important places? They are more likely to follow along and focus if their job is to fill in the blanks instead of taking a whole page of notes.

Adjust the assignment by having them do only half of the items.
Work some problems together to figure out where they are stuck.
(I took algebra in ninth grade but never understood it until I took remedial classes in college.)

Verbal encouragement works best when it is specific.  “Good job” is not as effective as “You did the first two steps of that problem correctly.”

Point out progress rather than focusing on what they didn’t do:  “You got 10 points on that assignment. That’s five more than yesterday.”

I have encountered a few students who, despite every strategy I tried, simply refused to work. They often had issues far outside the scope of school.

But I have also encountered many who, over time, developed confidence and the desire to progress.

Hang in there!

Anthony: Bring in a successful guest speaker. I doubt if they’ll say anything you haven’t already said a million times, but a fresh face can sometimes be influential. The key is to find someone they can relate to.

Antonio: Show them this chart from the Bureau of Labor Statistics about education and salaries, at www.bls.gov/emp/ep_chart_001.htm.
I recently discussed it with my seventh and eighth graders. They were amazed at the salary differences.

It opened up some great discussion.

Howard: Proximity, Praise, Prompt, and Leave:
  • Proximity. Move around the room and check work of all students (not just special ed). Notice who is stymied or not attending. Approach quietly. Whisper. Establish eye contact.
  • Praise. Note something the student has done: “Hey, you made it to class today.” “You have the first part of the problem figured out.”
  • Prompt. Briefly tell the student what to do next (less than 20 seconds): “Line up the value places in the problem.” “Six times eight is 48.” Don’t bring attention to what the student hasn’t done or mistakes. Tell them you will be back shortly to check.
  • Leave. Don’t “hover and smother.” Move to another student. Keep your comeback appointment.
LR: We have a similar problem on a American Indian reservation. The students are unmotivated. There is chaos in many homes.

Add the race dimension: “I’m not gonna work and you can’t make me because you’re not native. Anyone who cooperates with school authorities is trying to be White.”

Plus, the outsider dimension:  “You’re not from here. You don’t know anything about us.”

I am not White and I live on the reservation so I can know about my students and their lives.

How do we combat this?

Kate Ortiz:  LR, I have no experience teaching on a reservation, but it seems to me living in the community is an enormous asset.

Keep learning about your students. People lose negative attitudes faster when they feel valued.

Tell them, “You are right. I’m not from here. I chose to come here to live and teach, and I will listen to anything you can tell me that will help me help you learn.”



Help

NEA’s classroom management advice column

Kate Ortiz, a teacher and classroom management expert from Chariton, Iowa, responds to every question posted online within 24 hours, and many other colleagues contribute, too.

See the full forum, post your own problem (create a new topic), and get help!

© Copyright 2002-2010 National Education Association


Full article available at: http://www.nea.org/home/42309.htm.

Sunday, March 20, 2011

Just Being Audrey -- A Special Interview with my Best Friend, A Children's Book Illustrator

My best friend since third grade, Julia Denos, is now a widely established and praised children's book illustrator. Her most recent book is an adorable and thoughtful picture biography on Audrey Hepburn called Just Being Audrey.


I LOVED the book and learning more about this Hollywood, fashion, and humanitarian icon. Julia and author Margaret Cardillo have done several interviews on this not-to-miss book. More about this gem of a book (from http://fabaudrey.blogspot.com/2011/01/just-being-audrey.html):



Just Being Audrey

Hello everyone! I hope you are all happy and well in this new year. My apologies for falling behind on the news a bit, it's been busy, but I have a peace offering.
Next week the sweetest children's book is coming out, Just Being Audrey. I'm sure some of you have already heard about it, but if not, just look at how darling it is. I love the illustrations so much, don't you? If you do, click here to go to the illustrator's blog and see a few more pictures from the book, which she was kind enough to share from her advance copy of the book.

The book is 32 pages and illustrated quite a lot, and is ideally for the 4-8 year old age range, but of course that won't stop any of us, will it? I think it would make a lovely little coffee table book to have laying out, and your guests could learn about Audrey in 10 minutes flat. If you do know any children, even better, as the pictures will captivate them and the text is simple enough to get Audrey's life story across to anyone, whether they like reading or not.

I think, to make up for my spotty updates, I should give away a couple of copies of this book. It's just so cute and I want to share the cuteness, and I do feel bad for not being around more often lately. Would you be okay with a contest to win a copy?

----------
It is a wonderful story, and, of course, the illustrations are brilliant! I hope you read it and her interview below on how she and the author made Audrey: http://jamarattigan.livejournal.com/519924.html:



chatting with margaret cardillo and julia denos about just being audrey


"God kissed her on the cheek, and there she was." ~ Billy Wilder on Audrey Hepburn



I'm really happy to welcome author 
Margaret Cardillo and illustrator Julia Denos toalphabet soup today because I love love their new picture book biography, Just Being Audrey (Balzer + Bray, 2011)!

As a lifelong Audrey fan, I was truly excited when I first heard about this book when reading 
Julia's fab interview at 7-Imp. At a time when young girls look to celebrities for role models, and when all too often those role models disappoint, it's heartening to know that now Audrey's story can be held up as rock solid inspiration.

Distilling Hepburn's fascinating life into 32 pages must have been a daunting task, but Margaret and Julia have done a beautiful job of presenting significant milestones -- from Audrey's unique childhood in Nazi-occupied Europe, to her rise as an award-winning actress and fashion icon, to the tireless work she did on behalf of the world's impoverished children as International Goodwill Ambassador for UNICEF.



I love how 
Just Being Audrey captures the essence of Audrey's grace, elegance, style, beauty, indomitable spirit, and unfailing kindness. She was definitely someone who always remained true to herself, and it's exciting to see generation after generation, regardless of age or gender, continue to admire not only Audrey's "movie star" persona, but also the totally unassuming person she was in real life. The more you learn about Audrey, the more you want to emulate her conduct and live by her values. Margaret's and Julia's own admiration, enthusiasm and love for Audrey shine through on every page -- making this well-written, gorgeously illustrated book an especially good choice for Women's History Month and a wonderful keepsake for girls (and women) of all ages.

I know you'll enjoy hearing what Margaret and Julia have to say!

If you could meet Audrey today, what would you say to her?  
Margaret: I’d thank her for inspiring me, for being completely lovely and a great role model. And then I would listen to absolutely anything she had to say. I’d hang on every word and commit them to memory. Then I’d probably compliment her outfit because I’m sure it would be fabulous.

Julia: You know, I've spent months saying, "If only I'd had the chance to meet Audrey," but I could never imagine much beyond a big hug! I know I'd be speechless, but she'd probably break the ice by offering to make spaghetti.

(click to enlarge)
Why do you think it’s important for young readers to know about Audrey’s life?
Margaret: That’s the reason I wrote the book: to share the story of this amazing woman with young readers. When too many women use their celebrity for the wrong reasons, I wanted to celebrate a woman who used her celebrity for the right ones. She is an icon for her style and a role model for her actions. Her work with UNICEF was unprecedented. Before it was in vogue to give your name to charities, she was not only an ambassador for UNICEF, she was on the road for the majority of the year, in the villages holding sick children and embracing their mothers. There were no bounds to her love.

(click to enlarge)

Here was a girl who overcame enormous adversity during the war (and proved brave and kind even in the darkest hours). Then, as a young woman, she broke into one of the most difficult industries in the world—and always with a smile on her face and kind words. And she was always, always true to herself. No matter how different she looked or sounded, she never tried to dress or act like anyone other than herself. What better message is there for a young person? Be yourself. Be kind. That can be the foundation of a good person.

Julia: Audrey lived her life in a way that makes her a fabulous role model for young readers, especially young women.

She experienced war-time trauma as a child and endured. She invented her own brand of elegance by respecting her unique physical attributes, rather than trying to alter them; something rare in celebrities and is refreshing to see.

Besides her well-known outer beauty, Audrey is a lovely example of radiant inner beauty. She possessed some rare and admirable virtues: integrity, devotion, gratitude and humility. She believed in putting others first and lived her life accordingly. Audrey cared a lot about plain old kindness, and that every person had worth. Yes, she even did her homework! Directors always mentioned that she was punctual and always prepared for her scenes; Audrey claimed she HAD to study lines so intensely to compensate, since she did not possess the star quality that her peers did! She had also known what it was like to have nothing and never forgot that. Perhaps this is why she always chose to be grateful, always chose hope, and encouraged hope in others.
  

Audrey was a leader. In her speeches for UNICEF, she encouraged each of us to act on the responsibility we have to our needy family around the globe, especially children. Caring for the needs of others, and using her celebrity name to do so, became her singular goal at the end of her life.

Above all, Audrey is an example of simply living according to one's heart, which is a great message for a reader of any age. She was "just Audrey," despite fame and fortune. That is what made her a star.
What did you love most about working on this project? What proved to be the biggest challenge?
Margaret: I loved delving into her life and learning everything I could. Seeing the illustrations for the first time was a great day. I also really enjoyed (and still enjoy) hearing everyone’s stories about how and why they came to love Audrey. It’s not just older women, either. Men, young children, twenty-somethings. The reaction to Audrey Hepburn is visceral and I love hearing what she means to people. It’s great inspiration.

       
One of the biggest challenges for me was letting go of all the great and interesting facts about Audrey’s life. There was so much I wanted to squeeze in (I was so grateful to our fabulous editor and designer for figuring out how to get a timeline in the backmatter). It was so important to me to do her life story justice, a feat I now realize is basically impossible, because I’m still thinking to this day, “Well, what about this fact or this point?”

Julia: I loved watching Audrey's story unfold. It felt very special and overwhelming to be invited into someone's life story from beginning to end and try to create something to honor it. I also enjoyed learning gems that seemed off the beaten path for Audrey fans. One surprising find was Audrey's visual talent, her understanding of costume design and how she played a role in tailoring her look. She created art through her life and even painted.

        
           Photo credit: Mark Shaw (
Charmed by Audrey), painting for UNICEF.

Of course, I also loved that I was REQUIRED to surround myself in her fashion! Her life-long partnership with Hubert de Givenchy was inspiring and incredibly interesting to learn about. They were two driven people who genuinely loved and respected each others' crafts, assisted one another in building their careers, and were dear friends from Sabrina's dress to the end of her life. Audrey tended to take her favorite people with her, including her makeup artists credited for the "Audrey eye," the De Rossi's, who ended up dear friends of her family.

          
               Audrey with Hubert de Givenchy.

The biggest challenge was sitting at my desk, flooded with gorgeous imagery, and trying to figure out how to funnel it all into a "look" for Audrey that I could duplicate again and again. It was intimidating! It always takes a lot of drawing and giant leaps of faith to finally end up with a sketch that is free and light but still bears resemblance. 
You both did a lot of research. From your point of view as a writer or illustrator, which materials were the most helpful, enlightening, and/or inspiring?
Margaret: I read a lot of biographies for basic information. And towards the end I picked up a few gift books to get away from simply facts. I also read fan blogs for inspiration and motivation. I took something from all of them. My absolute favorite book was Audrey Hepburn’s son’s family memoir called Audrey Hepburn, An Elegant Spirit: A Son Remembers. Mr. Ferrer’s love for his mother is palpable and it is the closest I felt to knowing her. I also poured over The Audrey Hepburn Treasuresbecause I love all of those pockets with Audrey memorabilia.

Of course I watched and re-watched her movies (which, let me tell you, was the most difficult part of the research. “Excuse me,” I’d tell my family, “I HAVE to go watch 
Breakfast at Tiffany’s. It’s research for the book!) And then, at the end, I kind of had to forget all of it and write from my heart. I have such admiration for her and she has been such an inspiration to me and I wanted that to translate to the page. I knew I had to get a lot of facts into a small amount of space, but I also wanted some of that emotion to come through.

   

Julia: The main sources were biographies, which I read first. The stand out title was, 
Audrey Hepburn: An Elegant Spirit by Audrey's son, Sean Hepburn-Ferrer. His words kept her very real. Girlhood pictures kept her childlike spirit with me. Candid family photos from her website kicked off my inspiration. Another inspiring book,The Audrey Hepburn Treasures by Ellen Erwin and Jessica Diamond, contained personal objects like handwritten notes, family Christmas cards, Audrey's bran muffin recipe card! For visuals, of course I had the movies running constantly. I paused them often to look at details like shoe shapes and skirt movement.

There is 
this quiet little clip of her from "Gardens of the World" on YouTube. Between takes, the director asks her candidly about her work for UNICEF. I was so moved by this.
What’s your favorite spread in the book and why?

(click to enlarge)
Margaret: This is a question I dread people asking me. How do I choose? I am so lucky that Julia Denos agreed to illustrate the book. As soon as I saw her work, I knew she would be perfect. I want to live in her illustrations. When I saw the first sketch of Audrey it was like magic. I couldn’t wait to see what she would do with the book. Flipping through the first proof it was one “oohh” and “aahh” after another. And everyone in my family loves a different spread for a different reason, as do I. I will say that when I opened the spread that illustrates all of her movie roles, I had to catch my breath. It was just so perfect.

(click to enlarge)

Julia: My favorite spread is the one about Audrey's "style" with all the postcards. It was the most visually fun for me to try to capture Audrey's synthesis of style + spirit. It was the first time I felt like I cracked Audrey's code, and got her into the drawing. I also love Margaret's description of "the Audrey look" here. I enjoyed making and researching the "around-the-world" travel pieces, dreaming of a time when stamps were actually 4 cents! 
What’s your favorite Audrey movie and why? 
Margaret: Oh well, there you go! You’ve asked both the questions I dread answering! We have a Facebook fanpage for Just Being Audrey and the day the book came out we ran a contest: Name your favorite Audrey movie and why. The responses were fantastic. But it was very clear that most people have a hard time picking just one, which is such a testament to Audrey and the talented people she worked with. If forced, I’d have to say Roman Holiday. My mother introduced me to Audrey when I was about eleven. The first movie she showed me was Roman Holidayand it was love at first sight. Plus, I’m Italian so it holds a special place in my heart.


Audrey plays cards with co-star Gregory Peck on the set of 
Roman Holiday.

Julia: Oh no! Impossible to choose. There are pieces from every movie I adore: the letter-writing scene in 
Sabrina as "La Vie en Rose" drifts in: "I have learned how to live, how to be in the world and of the world and not just stand aside and watch" . . . Avedon's scrumptious Paris in Funny Face . . . but if I had to REALLY pick, then "by all means" Roman Holiday! It was my first Audrey movie and Audrey's first Hollywood film. Maybe that's why it's my favorite. I could see her blossom as an actress. Knowing her background story made me feel so proud of her, since she'd worked so hard to get there. The best scene is at The Mouth of Truth when Gregory Peck puts his hand in the statue's mouth and acts like it's been eaten! YIKES! Apparently, this was a little joke on Audrey, so her reaction is real on screen -- and it is PERFECT! Also love how she keeps asking Mr. Peck for "PAJAHHHHMAS."

      
          Audrey as Princess Ann in 
Roman Holiday
Jama: I don't know about you, but I could go on talking about Audrey all day long. And it *is* very hard to pick a favorite Audrey movie; interesting how both Julia and Margaret decided on Roman Holiday, and for largely the same reasons! They're the perfect match for telling Audrey's story, totally in sync, and I thank them so much for visiting today!!

What's
 your favorite Audrey movie?


JUST BEING AUDREY
written by Margaret Cardillo
illustrated by Julia Denos
published by Balzer + Bray (HarperCollins, January 2011)
Full Color Picture Book for ages 5+
Cool themes: self-actualization, ballet, movies, charity work, actors, Europe, fashion, kindness, gratitude.

♥ Official book trailer is 
here.

♥ Margaret Cardillo's 
official website and blog.

♥ Julia Denos's 
official website and blog.

♥ 
Just Being Audrey Facebook Page, with links to the great reviews it's been getting, like this one from Hannah Elliott at Forbes.

♥ Interviews: 
Margaret at the NY Daily NewsJulia at 7-Imp.

♥ Audrey Hepburn 
official website.

         
"If I'm honest, I have to tell you I still read fairy tales, and I like them best of all. " ~ Audrey Hepburn

*Spreads posted by permission, text copyright © 2011 Margaret Cardillo, illustrations © 2011 Julia Denos, published by Balzer + Bray/HarperCollins. All rights reserved.

**Unless otherwise noted, all photos from 
audreyhepburn.com.

Copyright © 2011 Jama Rattigan of jama rattigan's alphabet soup. All rights reserved.